I want to make clear up front that
I am not posting these here because I want to lambast the books or even want to
indicate they are bad books; they were just not for me. I have thoughts about both however that I
wanted to put down on paper so to speak.
I feel like a lot of the last year of reading, and this blog in fact, have
been about figuring out what exactly my reading tastes are…what makes me like or
dislike a particular book. Why it is
important for me to figure this out, I’m not really sure but I have done a lot
of speculating on this topic. This post
is more and the same.
The Gunslinger by Stephen King
Format: Audio (cds from library)
Narrated By: George Guidall
Original Publication Year: 2003
Genre: Fantasy, Horror
Series: Dark Tower Series #1
Awards: None
A couple of years ago I made a list
of authors that are prominently known and whose work I would probably like, but
for whatever I reason I have never read.
Stephen King was on this list (along with Cormac McCarthy, Iris Murdoch,
Sir Arthur Conan Doyle and a couple of others I can’t recall at the moment). So I did some research and came away with the
impression that The Stand was Stephen
King’s most generally well thought of novel.
So I dived right in last November.
If you’ve been stalking and paying
avid interest to my goodreads account, as I’m sure you do, you will know that The Stand has been on my Currently
Reading list since last November and has never made it over to ‘Read’. I have been on page 904 (out of 1320) for the
last 4 months. Somewhere around the 50%
mark I just lost steam with the book and have no real drive to pick it up. Don’t get me wrong. I’ve gotten to page 904
for pity’s sake so I WILL be finishing it which is why it languishes on the
‘Currently Reading’ stack instead of the ‘did not finish’ or ‘read stack’.
So why does the heading up top say
The Gunslinger? Well because in desperation I thought I’d try
something different. The Gunslinger seemed unique for King as
it is the first in a series and my impression that they were more towards the
fantasy side of things rather than horror. I even added it to my 100 books project. Well I was listening on cd and I gave it about 1
and ¾ cds before calling it quits and I realized that there was at least one
shared element with The Stand which
may have been at the root of my disengagement.
I really loved the first third to
half of The Stand ; where the human
race is falling a part and each of the unique and separate characters is
drawing together.Ironically, this is a part of the book that I think was heavily edited and cut in the original printing (I have a more recently produced "directors cut"). By the time everybody
is gathered together and arrayed on the sides of good or evil, I became bored
silly. I KNOW. And I think it’s
because everyone morphed from a unique interesting personality into an
archetype. They suddenly became
completely uninteresting to me. And that
was the same problem I ran into with The
Gunslinger. The characters were more
symbolic than real. Granted I didn’t
give it too much of a chance but I was not engaged.
So I’ve come to the reluctant conclusion
that Stephen King is not for me.
Certainly two books does not a body of work make and I have loved many of the
dramatizations of his worked (Salem’s Lot scared the bejesus out of me as a kid
and Stand By Me is one of my favorite
movies of all time). I was also blown
away by how good a writer King is – I sort of assumed because he was a bestseller
and so prolific that he would be a good storyteller but so-so writer. Well, you know what they say about assuming!
So maybe I just haven’t hit on the
right Stephen King book? Both of these
were very similar thematically as well – apocalypse, human race at its most
debased. Anybody have any good
suggestions?
Format: Audio (cds from library)
Narrator: Holter Graham
Original Publication Year: 2011
Genre: Paranormal Romance
Series: The League Gen 1 #3
Awards: Nope
Thinking about my reaction to the
first part of this book, I realize that I kind of lied above about the not lambasting. I was really pretty horrified with the start
of the book. It starts with a Dad and
his 8 year old son in a hot (i.e. threatening) situation and Dad makes young
son promise that he will always look out for his (older) sisters because he’s
the boy and they wouldn’t make it without him. The implication is that even though he is only 8 he will be much more competent at running the family because he's a boy and his sisters are stupid silly females.
It then fast forwards ten years and our hero Caillen is saving the hide
of one of his stupid worthless sisters while thinking that instead of helping
her he’d like to “beat her bloody”.
Ummm.. Seriously? Is Sherrilyn Kenyon a misogynistic dude in
disguise?
I was assuming that this horrific
set up was going to lead to some kind of a renaissance where Caillen learns
that women are not helpless, worthless punching bags good only for scratching
that itch. I decided to hang in. But then the book descended into descriptions
of how life-changingly hot Caillen is, how no woman has ever turned him down, his
good friend Darling can’t stop hitting on him and Caillen is also the best
fighter ever and real real smart. But he’s
not perfect, oh no… he had a “tragic childhood” it’s made him…horrors…improper
and afraid of too much clothing. AND OH
MY GOD how about just giving him this thing called a “personality”? Would that hurt too much? The entrance of the heroine is in comparison
minor and her name is Desideria (what?) which made me grimace every time it was
said (I was listening). So I basically gave up before figuring out if Sherrilyn Kenyon was going to make up for the early woman hating blather.
This book has a 4.33 rating on Goodreads.
So this is apparently not my kind
of book – it definitely works for other folks but not me. The uber Alpha male thing… just …ugh. I cannot take it anymore. Anybody have some recommendations of romances
with a more beta hero? Or at least on
the mild side of Alpha? If so I would
definitely like to hear about it. Romance
more than any other genre is hit or way, way miss with me. I feel like I need some guidance before I
wander into that minefield again….
Whew, I don't think I'd like that Kenyon book much, either. I'll have to try a different one when and if I try her.
ReplyDeleteDon't feel bad about DNFs. It's OK to stop reading if a book just isn't right for you (or if it's groaningly bad, of course!)
I'm pretty sure I have read a couple of her books in another series and while I don't remember loving them, I definitely didn't have such a strong negative reaction. But perhaps I was just in a different place and didn't notice the disturbing woman hating? I dunno. But I'll be interested to see, if you do read one of hers, what your thoughts are.
Delete